Highlights from over 20 years of experience.

 
Amkor Technology Inc. v. Carsem
 
The U.S. International Trade Commission ruled in favor of The Focal Point's client, Amkor Technology, and found that rival packaging supplier Carsem violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act in the importation and sale of devices that infringed Amkor's MicroLeadFrame patent.
 
 
 
Chiron v. Genentech
 
The jury unanimously agreed that counsel Keker & Van Nest had met the burden of "clear and convincing evidence" and found for Genentech on all counts.
 
     
 
Fenner v. Juniper Networks, et al.
 
The Focal Point teamed up again with the attorneys at Fulbright & Jaworski and local counsel to attain favorable results in a patent infringement suit against a host of large high tech companies such as Nortel, Nokia, Cisco Systems, and Ericsson.
 
 
 
Harris v. Ericsson
 
Harris Corporation asserted its patented technology and received a $61 million jury verdict.
 
     
 
InterTrust v. Microsoft
 
Described by Fortune magazine as "the biggest patent case ever," Microsoft paid $440 million to The Focal Point's client.
 
 
 
McKesson v. Bridge Medical
 
Accused infringer, Bridge Medical, recently prevailed in a long-standing patent infringement dispute brought by McKesson Information Systems.
 
     
 
O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPS)
 
The Focal Point worked with trial teams from Cooley Godward Kronish and Latham & Watkins to develop graphics that helped MPS win a full-Defense verdict in a patent infringement suit brought against them by O2 Micro International Limited. The jury determined that MPS did not literally infringe the asserted patent claims, and that O2 Micro's patent is invalid.
 
 
 
Positive Technologies v. LG Display and Toshiba
 
Positive Technologies, and the sole inventor of a patent on LCD display technology, Robert Hotto, sued numerous makers of LCD screens claiming that its novel way of driving the liquid crystals was being infringed.
 
     
 
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. v. Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. (TSMC v. SMIC)
 
Jeffrey Chanin, the lead attorney at Keker & Van Nest LLP representing TSMC, said the case amounted to "the biggest case of wholesale corporate espionage" he had ever encountered. A key challenge for the trial team was helping jurors understand and appreciate the extremely complex and detailed manufacturing processes and recipes of the technology at issue.
 
 
 
Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc.
 
The Focal Point worked with attorneys at McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff to win a hotly contested patent infringement suit against the first member of a Joint Defense Group—comprised of several companies which are involved in suits with Trading Technologies International, Inc. Trading Technologies' patents were validated which sent an important statement to all future Defendants.
 
     
 
Xilinx v. Altera
 
Graphics and animations, teaching everything from patent law to digital logic concepts, to chip-making specifications, and to the actual claims at issue, were created for lawyers and experts.